<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerning trend among Utah Republican leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blueinredzion.com/2009/09/concerning-trend-among-utah-republican-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blueinredzion.com/2009/09/concerning-trend-among-utah-republican-leadership/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=concerning-trend-among-utah-republican-leadership</link>
	<description>Poorly Spelled, Properly Thought Out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBT</title>
		<link>http://blueinredzion.com/2009/09/concerning-trend-among-utah-republican-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>JBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueinredzion.com/?p=720#comment-511</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article that accurately describes recent events.  The best argument in favor of both initiatives in my opinion is the loud opposition from those who are currently in power.

The basis of their anger toward these proposed changes is fear.  Fear of losing their power grip on Utah&#039;s politics and fear of being accountable to the citizens they were elected to serve.

Their frequent argument against ethics reform and contribution limits is that it will discourage new people from running for a public office.  It may very well discourage people like themselves from running, but that would leave more opportunities for those whose who are interested in public service rather than self service to become involved in state government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article that accurately describes recent events.  The best argument in favor of both initiatives in my opinion is the loud opposition from those who are currently in power.</p>
<p>The basis of their anger toward these proposed changes is fear.  Fear of losing their power grip on Utah&#8217;s politics and fear of being accountable to the citizens they were elected to serve.</p>
<p>Their frequent argument against ethics reform and contribution limits is that it will discourage new people from running for a public office.  It may very well discourage people like themselves from running, but that would leave more opportunities for those whose who are interested in public service rather than self service to become involved in state government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

