<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bills to Watch: HB 340 &#8211; Sexual Assault Victim Protocols, J. Biskupski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blueinredzion.com/2010/02/bills-to-watch-hb-340-sexual-assault-victim-protocols-j-biskupski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blueinredzion.com/2010/02/bills-to-watch-hb-340-sexual-assault-victim-protocols-j-biskupski/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bills-to-watch-hb-340-sexual-assault-victim-protocols-j-biskupski</link>
	<description>Poorly Spelled, Properly Thought Out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick</title>
		<link>http://blueinredzion.com/2010/02/bills-to-watch-hb-340-sexual-assault-victim-protocols-j-biskupski/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueinredzion.com/?p=1102#comment-608</guid>
		<description>After an email exchange with Representative Biskupski, I can understand the current amendment. As she writes, 

&quot;It is critical to refer these women to a properly trained facility to obtain the critical investigative information in these cases.  The current status for women is that they are already going to and being referred to the medical facilities that can handle these.  The reason for the bill was to not require instacares on the wasatch front to handle them.  They are not equipped or trained to handle these cases. Also, the 30 mile range was for rural utah. A standard for critical that is the Rural Healthcare Act.&quot;

I still have concerns that a poor victim from rural Utah is forced to travel up to 30 miles to get care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After an email exchange with Representative Biskupski, I can understand the current amendment. As she writes, </p>
<p>&#8220;It is critical to refer these women to a properly trained facility to obtain the critical investigative information in these cases.  The current status for women is that they are already going to and being referred to the medical facilities that can handle these.  The reason for the bill was to not require instacares on the wasatch front to handle them.  They are not equipped or trained to handle these cases. Also, the 30 mile range was for rural utah. A standard for critical that is the Rural Healthcare Act.&#8221;</p>
<p>I still have concerns that a poor victim from rural Utah is forced to travel up to 30 miles to get care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

