Bills to Watch: HB 268 – Disorderly Conduct Amendments, Rep. Paul Ray

Ray

Sadly, we live in a world where the threat of gun violence is all too real. From mass shootings to a drunken brawl, these deadly weapons have become engraved into our culture. Because of this cultural attitude towards guns, there becomes a sort of feedback loop wherein people first feel threatened by guns, go out and purchase their own to protect themselves from said guns, only to scare another individual to do the same.

This post, however, is not about having more or less guns on the street, what it is about is trying to reduce the real (or perceived) threat that guns present in our state. More specifically, this post is about how Representative Paul Ray (R – Clearfiled, District 13) is not helping the situation.

Representative Ray is introducing HB 268 – Disorderly Conduct Amendments this session much to the chagrin of those who are fearful of weapons in general and guns in particular. You see, HB 258 would allow people to openly walk around in public with a gun (or other dangerous weapon) in clear view without violation of the law.

First, we should ask ourselves why Ray wishes to propose such a law in this climate. Presumably he is coming from the mindset that states “people won’t go on mass shooting sprees if they know someone has a gun and could stop it.” Why else would he propose such a law? Clearly, he is not considering the fact that the mere presence of a gun causes unease among the general public – this is demonstrated by the fact that the bill outright says “The otherwise lawful possession of a dangerous weapon…does not constitute a hazardous or physically offensive condition, threatening behavior, or cause for public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm…”

Ray is clearly under the impression that we live in the wild west and that the only way to protect ourselves is to be packing heat. Ray, it appears wishes to deal with the problem of gun violence by putting more people on edge – calling these people on edge sissies, and overall not deal with the problem. This mindset is irresponsible and, frankly, uncivilized. This bill would do nothing to prevent mass shootings, nor would it do anything to prevent the enraged bar fight from getting out of hand – what it does do is give the impression that we fear our neighbor.

Think, too, about the impact this law would have to those visiting our state. Do we really want people reporting back that Utah is so crazy and violent that people feel the need to openly walk around with a gun or knife strapped to their bodies?

We as a society should be better than this, we should fear those who openly walk around with dangerous weapons because, if this bill were to pass, it would speak to how we have accepted violence as the norm and that the only solution to the problem is more intimidation. Let us instead continue to focus our efforts on keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous individuals and giving the individuals who are a threat to society the treatment they need.

To contact Rep. Ray, Click Here or call 801-725-2719

Impact on Average Utahn:

High Impact   5 . 4 . 3 . 2 . 1 . 0   No Impact

Need:

Necessary   5 . 4 . 3 . 2 . 1 . 0  Unnecessary

Overall Ranking:

Great Bill  5 . 4 . 3 . 2 . 1 . 0 . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5  Poor Bill

Questions about the rating system? Click Here

To view other bills in the 2013 Bills to Watch Series, Click Here

One Comment

  1. john merrick says:

    This Bill has ALEC (AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL) written all over it.
    That in and of itself is reason to oppose, aside from it being bad legislation.
    If you feel the need to carry a weapon get a concealed carry permit and carry it CONCEALED!

Leave a Comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree